Taxes on Smokers PDF Print E-mail

This letter-to-the-editor was published in the August 20 editiion of The Courier-Journal, and provides yet more good talking points against cigarette taxes.

Taxes on Smokers

Smokers already more than pay their "fair share," doling out $298 million in excise and sales taxes in 2007 (Aug. 16 editorial, "The good tax").
While the approach may be appealing at first glance, historically cigarette tax increases are notoriously unpredictable and often lead to higher overall tax rates.

They are also craftily presented as a tax increase that affects only smokers, but that isn't the case. The Maryland Legislature, for example, passed a $1 cigarette tax hike last year, saying it would be a reliable source of revenue. But now, to their "surprise," the revenue is expected to come up $20 million to $25 million short. This lack of cigarette tax revenue is a key contributor to the state's budget deficit, and now non-smoking residents will have to foot the bill.

Studies have shown that states with higher cigarette taxes also have higher total tax burdens. That's no coincidence. Cigarette taxes are an unstable source of revenue for the state and, like other tax increases, should be avoided.

JOHN NOTHDURFT
The Heartland Institute
Chicago 60603

The Heartland Institute is a national nonprofit research and education organization, based in Chicago. It is not affiliated with any political party, business, or foundation.

Heartland's mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems. Such solutions include parental choice in education, choice and personal responsibility in health care, market-based approaches to environmental protection, privatization of public services, and deregulation in areas where property rights and markets do a better job than government bureaucracies.

The Heartland Institutes website address is: www.heartland.org.

 
Cigarette Tax Burnout PDF Print E-mail

Great Talking Points from the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal:
Once again, the WSJ editorial writers get it right on the issue of cigarette taxes. Please copy and email this editorial to your State Senator, State Representative and Congressman. This is a great read on the folly and the hypocrisy of trying to balance state and federal budgets on the backs of smokers.

Wall Street Journal Editorial
Cigarette Tax Burnout
August 11, 2008

Politicians in Annapolis are scratching their heads wondering what happened to all those chain smokers who were supposed to help balance Maryland's budget. Last year the legislature doubled the cigarette tax to $2 a pack to pay for expanded health-care coverage. Eight months later, cigarette sales have plunged 25% and the state is in fiscal distress again.

A few politicians are pretending to be happy that 30 million fewer cigarette packs have been bought in the state so far this year. As House Majority Leader Kumar Barve put it, fewer people smoking is "a good thing." Yes, except that Maryland may be losing retail sales more than smokers. Residents of Maryland's Washington suburbs can shop in nearby Virginia, where the tax is only 30 cents a pack, and save at least $15 per carton.

The Maryland politicians are so afraid this is true that they've made it a crime for residents to carry two packs of cigarettes that weren't purchased in the state. In other words, the state says it's legal to smoke, so long as you use cigarettes that the government can tax and thus become a financial partner in your bad habit. But if you dare to buy smokes across state lines, you can be fined.

Maryland is only the latest state to prove the folly of trying to finance government with a tax on a shrinking pool of smokers. In New York City and State, tobacco taxes have been raised so many times that the retail cost can exceed $9 a pack -- about double the national average. Few budget-savvy smokers in the Big Apple pay that tax. Patrick Fleenor, an expert on tobacco taxes at the Tax Foundation, estimates that there is "now a 75% gap between cigarette sales in the city and cigarette consumption." In other words, three out of four cigarettes are bought elsewhere or are contraband. Out-of-state purchases, tax-free Internet sales and a cigarette black market are booming.

In New Jersey, about 40% of the Marlboros and Virginia Slims that are lit up escape the $2.57-a-pack tax. In Washington State, evasion was so rampant that the legislature decided in 2005 to lower the 75% tax on cigars and other tobacco products as a way to raise revenue and help state retailers.

Members of Congress, please take note. Democrats are planning one more pre-election go at a $35 billion children's health program expansion (S-chip) funded by a 61-cent per pack tobacco tax increase. They justify the new levy as a "sin tax." OK, but if Americans don't start sinning a whole lot more, states and Uncle Sam are going to go broke.

 
KATO's Mission Statement PDF Print E-mail

KATO was established in 2003 to work for a free and open market for tobacco products. KATO's primary prupose is to advocate that tobacco should be taxed like any other legal product and to point out the economic benefits of a viberant retail tobacco industry in Kentucky. KATO lobbys the Kentucky General Assembly on behalf of its members on tobacco tax and regulatory issues.

KATO also provides:

  • A monthly report of information and data concerning the tobacco industry 
  • Timely updates and notifications of government actions impacting tobacco 
  • A group health insurance plan for our members offered through Anthem Blue Cross/Blue Shield. 
  • A group merchant services plan for our members offered through Heartland Payment Systems. 
  • The Annual KATO Trade Show and Conference 
  • Assistance to our members with problems or questions regarding tobacco tax laws and
    regulations.
 
RocketTheme Joomla Templates